|
|
|
Fundamentals
Of Cathodic Protection
|
 |
When
dissimilar metals are in electrical or physical contact (the former through
an electrolyte), galvanic corrosion can take place. The process is akin to a
simple DC cell in which the more active metal becomes the anode and
corrodes, where as the less active metal becomes the cathode and is
protected. |
|
 |
The galvanic series shown in Table 1 can be used to predict the
metal which will corrode in contact with another metal, based on whether it
is cathodic or anodic with respect to another. |
|
 |
Cathodic
protection was first developed by Sir Humphrey Davy in 1824 as a means of
controlling corrosion on British naval ships. |
|
 |
Virtually all modern pipelines
are coated with an organic protective coating that is supplemented by
cathodic protection systems sized to prevent corrosion at holidays in the
protective coating. |
|
 |
This combination of protective coating and cathodic
protection is used on virtually all immersed or buried carbon steel
structures, with the exception of offshore petroleum production platforms
and reinforced concrete structures. |
|
 |
Table 1
shows the
theoretical electrochemical potentials obtained by pure metals in 1 N solutions
of their own ions.
|
|
 |
Figure 1
shows two of these
metals--iron and zinc--separately immersed in a weak mineral acid. The chemical
reactions that occur in Figure 1
are : |
|
|
Fe -->
Fe2+ + 2e-
|
Oxidation
reaction
|
|
2H+
+ 2e--->H2
|
Reduction
reaction
|
|
2H+
+ Fe --> Fe2+ + H2
|
Net
reaction
|
|
Zn -->
Zn2+ + 2e-
|
Oxidation
reaction
|
|
2H+
+ 2e- -->
H2
|
Reduction
reaction
|
|
2H+
+ Zn -->
Zn2+ + H2
|
Net
reaction
|
 |
Both metals corrode, and both corrosion
(oxidation) reactions are balanced by an equal reduction reaction, which in both
cases involves the liberation of hydrogen gas from the acid environments. |
|
 |
The
two corrosion reactions are independent of each other and are determined by the
corrosivity of hydrochloric acid on the two metals in question. |
|
 |
If the two metals were immersed in the
same acid and electrically connected Figure
2 the
reactions for zinc would then become: |
|
|
Zn -->
Zn2+ + 2e-
|
Oxidation |
|
2H+
+ 2e- -->
H2
|
Reduction |
 |
Almost all of the oxidation reaction
(corrosion of zinc) has been concentrated at the zinc electrode (anode) in
Figure
2 and almost all of the reduction reaction (hydrogen liberation) has
been concentrated at the iron electrode (cathode).
|
|
 |
The oxidation of the zinc
anode in
Figure
2 is much faster than that in
Figure 1. At the same time, most of the corrosion of iron in
Figure
1 has stopped in Figure
2 As shown
schematically, the zinc anode in Figure 1
has been
used to cathodically protect the iron cathode in Figure
2 . |
|
 |
Of course, some corrosion of the
iron may still occur; whether or not this happens depends on the relative
sizes of the zinc and iron electrodes. |
|
 |
Some reduction of hydrogen may still
occur on the zinc anode. The anode is the electrode at which a net oxidation
reaction occurs, whereas cathodes are electrodes at which net reduction
reactions occur. |
|
 |
All cathodic protection systems require an anode, a
cathode, an electric circuit between the anode and cathode, and an
electrolyte. |
|
 |
Thus, cathodic protection will not work on structures exposed
to air environments. The air is a poor electrolyte, and it prevents current
from flowing from the anode to the cathode. |
|
|
Table 1 Standard electromotive force series for selected metals |